国产电影午夜成年免费视频,国产一级二级在线观看,国产亚洲精品福利,久久国产精品只做精品

您當前的位置:首頁(yè) >招標項目搜索>招標項目詳情

法國開(kāi)發(fā)署貸款陜西省寶雞市鳳翔區東湖雍城湖濕地治理項目(考古遺址與自然景觀(guān)保護與發(fā)展)第5包:博物館建筑群總包(初步設計+施工圖設計+施工+采購)(重新招標)

發(fā)布時(shí)間:2023-09-25

法國開(kāi)發(fā)署貸款陜西省寶雞市鳳翔區東湖雍城湖濕地治理項目(考古遺址與自然景觀(guān)保護與發(fā)展)第5包:博物館建筑群總包(初步設計+施工圖設計+施工+采購)(重新招標)評標結果公示

 

項目名稱(chēng):法國開(kāi)發(fā)署貸款陜西省寶雞市鳳翔區東湖雍城湖濕地治理項目(考古遺址與自然景觀(guān)保護與發(fā)展)第5包:博物館建筑群總包(初步設計+施工圖設計+施工+采購)(重新招標)

招標編號: 0733-23090492

選擇方法:技術(shù)標與財務(wù)標綜合評估

業(yè)主名稱(chēng)寶雞市鳳翔區林業(yè)局

招標代理:中信國際招標有限公司

 

一、評標情況:

1. 投標人名稱(chēng):中交建筑集團有限公司、中國航空規劃設計研究總院有限公司聯(lián)合體 

技術(shù)綜合得分:0.58分

財務(wù)綜合得分:0.34分

綜合得分:0.92分

投標報價(jià)(不含稅/歐元):30,484,997.95

評標價(jià)(不含稅/歐元30,484,997.95

未中標理由:實(shí)質(zhì)性響應招標文件要求,綜合得分排名第二。

2. 投標人名稱(chēng):陜西建工第一建設集團有限公司與重慶大學(xué)建筑規劃設計研究總院有限公司聯(lián)合體

技術(shù)綜合得分:0.65分

財務(wù)綜合得分:0.35分

綜合得分:1分

投標報價(jià)(不含稅/歐元):29,973,953.15

評標價(jià)(不含稅/歐元29,973,953.15

中標理由:實(shí)質(zhì)性響應招標文件要求,且綜合得分最高。

3. 投標人名稱(chēng):中國建筑第六工程局有限公司、中國建筑上海設計研究院有限公司

技術(shù)綜合得分:/

財務(wù)綜合得分:/

綜合得分:/

投標報價(jià)(不含稅/歐元):/

評標價(jià)(不含稅/歐元/

未中標理由:根據招標文件第一章第4.2款的規定:“投標人不應存在利益沖突,發(fā)現存在利益沖突的任何投標人均不合格......”和招標文件第二章 ITB 4.2的規定:“2)......其中本合同包的潛在投標人若與本項目第1包總體方案設計包(除大遺址)的中標人(包括聯(lián)合體牽頭方和成員方)直接或間接的共同處于他人控制之下,則被視為利益沖突。(詳見(jiàn)補遺(三)),評標委員會(huì )經(jīng)討論后一致認為,該投標人與本項目第1包總體方案設計包(除大遺址)中標人之間存在利益沖突,不能滿(mǎn)足招標文件第三章 評標和資格標準“2.資格要求”1.合格性中的“1.2 利益沖突”的要求,因此不能通過(guò)資格審查。并根據招標文件第二章ITB14.1&14.2規定:“投標人應滿(mǎn)足第三章的資格要求。在對技術(shù)投標文件和投標報價(jià)進(jìn)行評審之前,應當先對投標人資格進(jìn)行評審。不滿(mǎn)足“第三章評標和資格標準”的投標人其投標將被拒絕。”。綜上,該投標人未能通過(guò)資格審查,投標被拒絕。

 

 

二、中標人及合同授予情況:

中標人名稱(chēng)

陜西建工第一建設集團有限公司與重慶大學(xué)建筑規劃設計研究總院有限公司聯(lián)合體

授標價(jià)格

(不含稅)

29,973,953.15

工期

24個(gè)月

項目經(jīng)理

姓名

彭進(jìn)全

項目經(jīng)理

相關(guān)證書(shū)和編號

1. 一級建造師注冊證書(shū)(注冊編號:陜1612006200801235)

2. 高級工程師(陜人職字【2013】232號

3. 安全生產(chǎn)考核合格證書(shū)(B證)(編號:陜建安B(2008)0000428)

 

三、提出異議的渠道和方式

各投標人或其他利害關(guān)系人如對以上公示結果存有異議,請在本項目公示期結束前,即自本結果發(fā)出起3)個(gè)日歷日內至2023928日午夜,以書(shū)面形式(投標授權代表簽字并加蓋公章)將相關(guān)異議提交業(yè)主單位和招標代理公司聯(lián)系方式如下)。

 

業(yè)主單位:寶雞市鳳翔區林業(yè)局

聯(lián)系人:李紅英

地址:陜西省寶雞市鳳翔區雍城大道中段

電話(huà):+86-917-7219650

郵箱:bjsfxqxmb@126.com

 

招標代理公司:中信國際招標有限公司

聯(lián)系人:楊庚旭、郭欣悅

地址:北京市海淀區中關(guān)村南大街1號友誼賓館蘇園17單元

電話(huà):+86-10-68946709

郵箱:yanggx@biddingcitic.com, guoxy@biddingcitic.com

 

  中信國際招標有限公司

                                 二〇二三二十五

 

 

 

Announcement of Bid Evaluation Results of Lot 05: Museum complex EPC (preliminary design + construction drawing design+ construction + procurement)Rebiddingof Dong Lake & Yongcheng Lake Wetland Restoration Project of Fengxiang District, Baoji City, Shaanxi Province (Protection and Development of the Archaeological and Natural Site) Financed by Agence Française de Développement

 

Project Name: Dong Lake & Yongcheng Lake Wetland Restoration Project of Fengxiang District, Baoji City, Shaanxi Province (Protection and Development of the Archaeological and Natural Site) Financed by Agence Française de Développement Lot 05: Museum complex EPC (preliminary design + construction drawing design+ construction + procurement)Rebidding

IPC No.: 0733-23090492

Selection method: Evaluation of Combined Technical and Financial Bids

Employer: Fengxiang District Forestry Bureau of Baoji City

Procurement Agent: CITIC International Tendering Co., Ltd

 

I. Evaluation Situation:

1. Name of the Bidder: Consortium of CCCC Construction Group Co., Ltd. and China Aviation Planning and Design Institute (Group) Co., Ltd. 

Technical Comprehensive Score: 0.58 points

Financial Comprehensive Score: 0.34 points

Comprehensive Score: 0.92 points

Bid Price (excluding taxes/ Euro): 30,484,997.95

Evaluated Bid Price (excluding taxes/ Euro): 30,484,997.95

Reasons for why not selected: The bid is substantially responsive but the comprehensive score ranked second.

2. Name of the Bidder: Consortium of the SCEGC No.1 Construction Engineering Group Co., Ltd. and Research Institute of Architectural & Planning, Design Co., Ltd, Chongqing University

Technical Comprehensive Score: 0.65 points

Financial Comprehensive Score: 0.35 points

Comprehensive Score: 1 point

Bid Price (excluding taxes/ Euro): 29,973,953.15

Evaluated Bid Price (excluding taxes/ Euro): 29,973,953.15

Reasons for why selected: The bid is substantially responsive and got the highest comprehensive score.

3. Name of the Bidder: China Construction Sixth Engineering Bureau Corporation Limited and China Shanghai Architectural Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd.

Technical Comprehensive Score: /

Financial Comprehensive Score: /

Comprehensive Score: /

Bid Price (excluding taxes/ Euro): /

Evaluated Bid Price (excluding taxes/ Euro): /

Reasons for why not selected: As specified in 4.2 in Section I of the bidding documents, “A Bidder shall not have a conflict of interest. Any Bidder found to have a conflict of interest shall be disqualified......”. As specified in ITB 4.2 in Section II of the bidding documents, “2) ......If a potential bidder of Lot 05 and the successful bidder (including the leading party and any member party of the JV) of Lot 01: Global programming for the whole project (except archaeological sites programming) of this Project are directly or indirectly under the control of a third party, it will be considered as a conflict of interest (see Addendum (III)). Through discussion, the bid evaluation committee concluded that the Bidder has a conflict of interest with the successful bidder of Lot 01: Global programming for the whole project (except archaeological sites programming) of this Project. Therefore, the Bidder can not meet the requirements of “1.2 Conflict of Interest” in “1. Eligibility” in “2. Qualification Requirements” in Section III - Evaluation and Qualification Criteria and thus fail to pass the qualification examination. And according to ITB 14.1&14.2 in Section II of the bidding documents, “Bidders shall meet qualification requirements specified in “Section III - Evaluation and Qualification Criteria”. Bidder’s qualification shall be evaluated before evaluation of the technical part of bid and the bid price. Bids which are not compliant with the requirements of Section III shall be rejected. Based on the above mentioned, the Bidder failed to pass the qualification examination and its bid is rejected.

II. The Successful Bidder and Contract Award Information:

Name of the Successful Bidder

 Consortium of the SCEGC No.1 Construction Engineering Group Co., Ltd. and Research Institute of Architectural & Planning, Design Co., Ltd, Chongqing University

Contract Award Price

(Excluding Tax)

29,973,953.15

Duration of Construction

24 months

Name of the Project Manager

Peng Jinquan

Project manager Certificate and Certificate No.

1. Grade I Qualification Certificate of Registered Constructor (Registration ID: Shaan1612006200801235)

2. Senior Engineer (SRZZ [2013] No. 232)

3. Safety Production Assessment Certificate (Certificate B)(ID: SJA B (2008) 0000428)

 

III. Channels and Methods for Raising Objections:

If any bidder or other interested party has any objections to the above publicity results, please submit the relevant objections in writing (signed by the authorized bid representative and stamped with the official seal) to the Employer and Procurement Agent (contact information is as follows) within three (3) calendar days (until midnight on September 28, 2023) from the issuance of this result before the end of the publicity period of this project.

 

Employer: Fengxiang District Forestry Bureau of Baoji City

Attention: Ms. Li Hongying

Address: Middle section of Yongcheng Avenue, Fengxiang District, Baoji City, Shaanxi Province

Telephone: +86-917-7219650

Email: bjsfxqxmb@126.com

 

Procurement Agent: CITIC International Tendering Co., Ltd.

Attention: Mr. Yang Gengxu, Ms. Guo Xinyue

Address: 4/F, No.17th Unit, Su Yuan, Beijing Friendship Hotel, Haidian District, Beijing

Telephone:+86-10-68946709

Email: yanggx@biddingcitic.com, guoxy@biddingcitic.com

 

CITIC International Tendering Co., Ltd.    

September 25, 2003

 

 

現匯項目 更多>

亞行世行 更多>

外國貸款 更多>